Amazon Kindle 6″ (Wi-Fi)

Amazon Kindle

I have avoided reviewing the Amazon Kindle for some time.  Basically because, being that it is now the best selling of all time on Amazon that everybody either knew about or already had a Kindle.  So I thought there was really no point to it.

But as I look around now, I realize that there is some confusion, brought on mostly by the surge of the tablet market, led by devices like the iPad and Motorola Xoom (review coming soon), and even to a lesser extent by devices like the Archos 70 (review) and or even the iPod Touch.  Items such as these have clouded the though process and created some confusion.  Do I really need an eBook reader if I have a tablet?  What are the advantages of the eReader and so on.  So, finally I decided to put fingers to keys, and give you the good and the bad of the Kindle, and hopefully enough information to decide if a dedicated eReader is for you.

eReader versus Tablet

This is probably going to seem backwards for most, but in today’s market, before delving into specs and comparing like devices (Kindle, Nook, Sony eReader, Kobo, etc.), the initial battle is, whether to bother with an eReader at all or just to go with a tablet device.  So rather than dealing with the details that would be moot if you opted for a tablet, I thought it would be wise to start there.

First of all, you do not even need to necessarily decide on tradeoffs when considering a tablet.  Amazon has done a magnificient job of bringing the Kindle software to virtually every platform.  You can read Kindle Books on any PC as well as an iPad and virtually any Android based device (meaning tablets like the Motorola Xoom, Archos 70, Samsung Tab or any Android mobile handset).  Sure, the iPad also has the iBook Store, but honestly, I don’t know anybody that uses it.  Less content, the same or higher prices, despite the attempt by Apple to undermine the Amazon eBook market, this is just merely a side highlight to the most ardent of Apple fans that want to ensure all their money goes through Apple.  Beyond Amazon, Barnes and Noble (Nook), Borders and Sony also offer their software for some or all tablets, so really whatever store you wish to use, you can get it on a tablet.  If this were the only factor, then it would be easy, the tablets cost more, but they do more, and you can get the same content.  End of story, right?  Not so fast, if that was all there was, do you think I would have bothered to make this comparison?

Tablets have the one fatal flaw that have kept eBooks from being popular long before now.  An LCD screen.  Regardless of the resolution of the display, LCD is still the same back lit technology that has powered computer screens for some time, and have all the same drawbacks, including the most famous… it makes your eyes tired.  LCD viewing angles also must be considered because if you don’t look at an LCD straight on, the display is altered (how much depends on the device) not to mention reflections (reading lamp, or other light source reflecting off of the glass screen)… and while we are on the subject of light, an LCD is notoriously difficult to see in bright daylight.  I know the example is always showing somebody reading on the beach, but consider other possibilities that might be more common.  For the soccer mom, waiting in the bleachers during soccer (or baseball, softball, etc) practice.  Dad, out at a campsite.  Or anyone, just sitting out in the yard while the kids play.

So, depending on how you view the importance of some of these issues, it may seem a wash at this point,  Each have their good and bad points, but here is a few more things to consider.

Color.  eInk (the technology behind eReaders like the Kindle) do not currently offer Color.  The layout possibilities are also somewhat limited and graphics are not always intended for black and white.  This makes magazine reading on a Kindle a less than optimum experience.  If you read more magazines than you do books, then this would be a major plus for going with a tablet.

Contrast.  I mentioned it briefly above, but eInk offers much lower contrast, making it optimum for reading in bright light, and is easier on the eyes for long periods of sitting with a novel.  If you spend more times with novels in your hand, then the eReader is the leader.

Battery Life.  eInk as mentioned does not have a back lit display.  Which means there is nothing sucking down battery life in between page flips.  Whereas a tablet will get 8-10 hours before you need to plug it in, you can get weeks (Amazon says up to a month) between charges.  So even if you leave the charger at home, you can probably make it through your vacation, sitting and reading on the beach and still have battery life left for the ride home.

Weight.  The iPad weighs in around 1.5 pounds (the Xoom, a few more ounces than that) but the Kindle weighs in a svelte .54 pounds.  At first blush, this doesn’t seem like that big a deal, but sit there reading a novel for any length of time, and your wrists will certainly let you know about the difference in weight.  Simply put, an Kindle weights about as much (or less) than many paperback books, whereas a tablet feels like you are holding a hardcover Oxford dictionary.  Which do you think is more comfortable holding up for a long period of time?

Price.  No, a Kindle cannot do everything a Tablet does.  It does have a browser in it, but it really is not intended for web browsing, instead the browser is a throw in, really intended for when you want to hook up your wi-fi to an access point that requires you to log in (such as McDonalds, Starbucks, etc).  That being said, the Kindle doesn’t cost anywhere near as much.  At $139, it is not quite disposable pricing, but it is pretty darn close.  With Smart Phones now dominating the market, most people will spend more on a phone that they will discard in 12-18 months.

So, if you have decided, I don’t care, a tablet is for me, then you can stop here.  But  if you are still considering the eReader (and from my personal point of view, I don’t know why you wouldn’t), then read on.

Tell me more about the Kindle

Despite what most people think, eReaders… or at least eReader software, has been around for quite some time.  I remember having Microsoft Reader on my Cassiopeia PDA back around 2000, and there was eReader software for the Palm Pilot even before that.  But, digital books had not caught on in any great fashion until Amazon introduced the Kindle.  Even with the much higher price of the original Kindle ($399 if I remember correctly) the original Kindle sold out quickly and had been selling well ever since (and became the best selling product at any price for Amazon as of late 2010).  The combination of infrastructure, book pricing and timing have all led to the Kindle being the leader in eBook devices.

Over time the Kindle has gotten smaller, sleeker and (possibly most importantly) cheaper.  The original Kindle offered their connection over a free (to the user) 3G connection, which is somewhat convenient, but more expensive to Amazon.  In 2010, they introduced the new Kindle 3 with a version that was wi-fi only, and at the new low price of $139 which is where it stands now.

The device, as I mentioned earlier weighs about 1/2 a pound, is small compact and as easy to carry around as a standard paper back book, except instead of carrying one book with you, you can carry approximately 3,500 books with you at any given time.  Just try stuffing that much reading material in your purse or briefcase.

The eInk technology is also very book like in readability, with the exception that you can change the size of the print.  So, if those eyes just don’t see quite as well as they used to, you can set the print size to whatever is most comfortable for your reading enjoyment.  The Kindle gets complaints from people about lack of page numbering (though this is now being offered in the future on many books), but in reality this is really not all that necessary (except when say reading a book in a class where a teacher tells you too read or cite a specific page or pages).  Since different editions have different page numbers (depending on size of page, print size, etc), page numbering is not as “universal” as most people make it out to be.

Amazon currently brags a store of over 810,000 books available for purchase (including 107 out of 111 NY Times best sellers) in the United States (pricing and availability varies in other countries and is directly tied to the publishers).  In addition Amazon has over 1.8 Million Free out-of-copyright books available, and you can also load or download free books from Internet Archive (over 2.5 million free books), Open Library (over 1 million free books), and others.

You can now also (it was not introduced until late 2010) lend books that you have purchased to other Kindle users for up to 2 weeks.  There are however limitations, which we will discuss in next in the drawbacks.

I’m going to be honest.  I have never been what you would call an avid reader. I originally grabbed a Kindle to be able to lug around my tech and programming books without breaking my back. But once I started downloading few things onto a Kindle and reading… the convenience of it reminded me why I used to read for fun a long time ago.  Having something small that I could bring a virtual library of material with me at any given time?  Awesome.

I tried reading on my tablet, and in a pinch at times it will do.  And I may use that for magazine subscriptions for the full color layouts.  But reading on the LCD for any length of time irritates my eyes.  It really does.  I didn’t think this was actually true, but I can tell the difference between reading on the two devices and how tired my eyes get after a few pages.  Yes, I am fortunate enough that I can afford both devices, but honestly, if I had my tablet alone, I don’t think I would be reading anywhere near as much as I have been.

OK, how about the Not so Good things?

As good as the Kindle is, there are some certain and definite drawbacks to the eReader device.

No support for ePub.  Amazon Kindle does not support ePub or DRMed PDF files.  This means that local libraries which lend out books in this format, cannot be read on the Kindle.  I am not sure if this was a decision Amazon made, or just one of the things they had to do to get the deals they have with publishers.  Either way, it stinks for the consumer.  The much less popular Nook and Sony Reader both support this format, so if you plan on using your local library for books, this is a deal breaker.

Lending. Yes, you can finally lend Kindle books to a friend.  Well, some of them anyway.  It seems that features like Voice to Text and lending can be limited by the publishers.  Thus there are books you can lend, and others you cannot.  This is just plain annoying, and proof that Publishers still don’t get it.  They want to be able to charge higher prices for eBook, but not allow the buyer any to do any of the things they would do with a normal paper book.  I’m sure this will get ironed out in time, just as being able to lend ANY books on the Kindle was… but that may take some time.

A bit delicate.  No, not fine china delicate but..  The disadvantage of making something so small and light is that the lighter you make it, the easier it is to break.  And for some reason, rather than pressing, the letters on the keyboard are painted on, making it possible to “rub” them off with constant contact. I definitely recommend getting a cover if you purchase a Kindle.

Price of Books.  This is not a knock on the Kindle, but IS certainly something you have to consider when looking at an eReader (whether it is the Kindle or a tablet or any digitial device). Publishers are still grappling with the move to digital, and are making plenty of bad choices and doing things to harm consumers in the process.  Trying to force book prices higher is one of those things.  Some publishers set their digital price rather than allowing Amazon to set the price as they do with normal paperback books.  For those books, in many instances the price of the eBook is actually higher than the paperback, despite the lack of physical media that needs to be shipped or production costs.  It is publishers trying to hang tight to an old tired model.  This is not Amazon’s fault, nor is it a knock on the Kindle, but IS something that needs to be considered when deciding to go digital.  Will this eventually shake itself out and will logic win out?  I believe so.  But it may take some time.

Conclusions

I think this is one of the biggest points right now worth considering.  If you are looking at a tablet because of everything else, when you consider the benefits of eInk and the ease of reading, if you can, it might be worth consider getting both.  A tablet does not have to exclude an eReader, because they are not comparable devices.  This is a single purpose device at a great price that might be worth having in addition to your tablet.  Consider this.  Even if you are not worried about the glare… are you really going to take your much more expensive tablet to the beach? Or Poolside?  Or really anywhere that it could potentially get damaged?  At this price, if you can afford it (and if you can’t… can you really afford that tablet you are considering?) why not have an eReader at your disposal?

Take a look at the reviews on Amazon (just click the picture of the Kindle in the top right corner there).  I am not the only one.  Many people have rediscovered the joys of reading with this device.  It is inexpensive, easy to use, can hold an amazing number of books, and won’t weigh you down.  Amazon has a winner in the Kindle, and despite what naysayers think about this single purpose device in the age of tablets, I don’t believe it is going anywhere any time soon.

Archos 70 Internet Tablet

Archos 70 Internet tablet

Archos 70 Internet tabletThe Archos 70 Internet tablet is yet another Android Tablet that was rushed out the door before Android was “officially” ready to be put on a tablet device. Thus I have been very hesitant to really look at these tablets. However, unlike many of the unfinished, unpolished and usually unresponsive tablets that came before it, this little device is actually functional.

Despite what Apple leader Steve Jobs thinks, there is certainly a market that is ripe for 7″ tablets.  Now, whether the Archos 70 is the device for you, really depends on what you want to do with it.  This one was a Xmas present for my daughter who initially asked for an iPod Touch.  Since we are an Apple free household (sans one stupid 2nd Gen iPod Nano I haven’t gotten my wife to give up), I needed an alternative, and in this mode… a game device that is bigger than the Touch, but still allows her to play games, play music and do other such things, the device has been a winner.  As a book reader that also does a couple of other “tricks” (like play backgammon, which my wife seems to be addicted to on this device), and thanks to its light weight is up to the task without you having to work out to strengthen you arms.

At around $329 the Archos 70 (for the 8GB Flash Drive model that I have, there is also a 250GB hard drive version available that runs about $339)  is certainly not bottom of the barrel cheap, and was more expensive than the iPod touch, but that is because it sports a fantastic 800 x 600 capacitive display that is responsive to the touch, smooth to operate, and light enough that you are not going to develop carpal tunnel trying to hold it up.  Also worth noting, the Archos 70 supports MicroSD cards, so you can expand your storage later by popping in an inexpensive MicroSD.

The device came with Android 2.1 out of the box, but upon setup upgraded to 2.2, providing it with Flash capabilities when browsing the web (something you will NEVER get from an iPad).  The web is still a little cramped at this resolution and size, but it is still far better an experience than you would get with a phone.  Browsing the web over the wi-fi connection was a bit slower than a desktop computer, but equal to or faster than any phone browser, and while you still needed to scroll a bit to see some web pages, it was still a satisfactory browsing experience.  Checking e-mail, Twitter and Facebook were all relatively easy and painless as well, but Google Docs and Spreadsheets was finicky.

Archos also included a front facing (VGA) camera and built in microphone, so you can Skype, use Video Chat with GTalk or Yahoo!IM and other Chat and IM programs.  The VGA camera doesn’t provide the best display,but is satisfactory for a quick messaging chat or letting GrandMa see and talk to the kids.

Another nice feature built in (that I doubt anyone will use) is the HD output.  You can run HD video and display it on any HD television (additional cable not included of course).  I have this ability on my Droid phone as well, but at least my Droid can RECORD HD content.  The Archos can’t, so you are (presumably) going to copy HD content onto this device, to show it on another?  I guess I see what they are trying to do, I just can’t see it being used in this way.

So, I guess the question remains… is this tablet for me?  If you want it to read a book, play a game, keep lists on, light web browsing and playing games, they this might be worth taking a look. If you are looking for something better than an iPod Touch but not a full blown tablet, then yes this a good device to put in the running.

Many parents may consider the $329 price steep for a “toy” but most kids would get far more out of this than a Nintendo DS or PlayStation Portable or even an iPod Touch.  It may not be an “iPad killer” but is certainly kinder on your wallet, and much more portable as well.

If however, you want it for heaving browsing, document editing, or laptop replacement, then this is certainly NOT the device you want. In reality, in these cases, you will need to wait for a device like the Motorola Xoom or LG G-Slate or other Android 3.0 (aka Honeycomb) devices.  For heavy use, the better stuff is on the way, and hold your purchasing power until they arrive.

Viewsonic G Tablet

Much to my utter surprise, I have to eat some crow this year and admit that tablets (and yet most notably the Apple iPad) took off in a way that I never really expected.  Of course, it is well known by anybody that reads this or anything I write, that the chances of owning an Apple product is less than zero, so I have been anxiously awaiting a worthy competitor built on either Windows (or some variation of it), or Android.

Despite much fanfare almost a lifetime ago (Consumer Electronics Show in January of 2010), virtually nothing has a appeared in the way of a Windows tablet.  There have been a number of Android tablet that have come out, most of which have been complete and utter junk and not even worth mentioning, and only recently did some that were even worth looking at began to appear.

The first one that I finally decided to break down and drop some money on was the Viewsonic G Tablet.  At around $400, the specs on the G Tablet looked almost too good to be true.  A Nvidia Tegra 2 (Dual Core) processor, a 10.1″ multi-touch capacitive display (quick shortcut and hint… if it has a resistive display, no matter how good the price, in my opinion, it simply isn’t worth looking at as viable option). 1080p playback enabled, wi-fi, 16GB of internal storage and microSD slot to expand that storage further.

I knew there would be some limitations going in that I was willing to overlook as an early adopter, but would be sticking points for mainstream consumers like the fact that Google really doesn’t not consider Android a “Tablet Ready” OS their specs make it impossible for any tablet that does not have 3G built in to get the Google apps or official Android Market.  If you are not comfortable side-loading or getting apps from other locations you might as well stop here.  Sure Viewsonic does now include a store (which in a bizarre twist had to be added in one of the G Tablet’s updates, since it did not include a link to this store in the initially shipping version of the tablet).  But for those of you still willing to forge ahead, the problems do not stop there.

The Bad

For a monitor company, I am baffled at the fact that Viewsonic would release a tablet with viewing angles as poor as what comes in the G Tablet.  You must view this thing head on or the picture immediately becomes useless.  Yes it is true you are generally looking at the tablet when using it, but angles are necessary for typing and resting the unit comfortably while using, and those angles immediately cause degradation of viewing experience.

For some reason only knows to the people involved with the cash dealings, partnerships and greased palms can actually tell you why, but the G Tablet ships with  a skinned interface called Tap-n-Tap.  Now I understand the general premise that this was supposed to be a consumer friendly UI that took better advantage of the bigger screen real estate on this tablet, but it is simply terrible.  It is slow, causes stuttering and basically turns this powerful tablet into a glorified (and overpriced) digital picture frame.

Despite the tablet touting in initially advertising and on the box support for Adobe Flash, the shipping unit did not come with Flash installed, and most mention of it (except for one icon left behind) has been eradicated (that had a post stating that Flash would be available December 19th, but I guess that isn’t happening now).

The G Tablet has a front facing camera (that is actually a good thing), but for some odd reason doesn’t have a back camera and even more importantly, doesn’t ship with any software that actually makes use of the front camera.  This is a very disconcerting omission, and so far, I have yet to find an app that uses the camera well.

The Good

OK, so by this point, you are probably wondering, why the heck anybody in their right mind would buy the G Tablet.  I have to admit, that there is a very finite audience for this tablet, and there is as I see it, only two specific use cases where I could honestly say that this is a good tablet for you to consider.  The first being you only intent to use the tablet as a glorified Picture Frame/Weather Station device.  Sort of like a large flat screen Chumby.  With its Android underpinnings and larger screen, if you did want a “station” like that, then the G Tablet may fit that use case.

The second is if you are the type of person that isn’t adverse to “jailbreaking” or “Rooting” you device.  Some Developers over at XDA have done a nice job of creating a ROM that functions well, provides access to the Android Market, Google Apps and Flash.  If you are comfortable flashing your device (or know somebody you can trust to do it for you), adding custom ROMS  and generally spending some time tweaking your device, then the G Tablet is perfectly servicable and will give you a head start and/or glimpse of what is most likely in store for Android tablets.  If you don’t mind rolling up your sleeves and digging in like this, the experience can be rewarding and give you bragging rights to a device that stands out now.

If however words like “ROMS”, “Rooting” or “Jailbreaking” mean nothing to you (or cause you to break out in a cold sweat), then this is most likely NOT the device for you.   You may wish to consider the 7″ Samsung Tab (review forthcoming) or waiting to see what is announced at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in January.

Conclusion

It is possible that the Tap-n-Tap interface will be fixed and that this device will become more useful in the future, but if you are going to wait for that to happen, I’d say unless you want to get a head start (i.e. a programmer or designer looking to do something before all the good devices are released) and are willing to hack it, keep the $400 in your pocket until something better comes along or until this tablet is given an update that allows it to live up to its potential.

Alchemy for Android

androidalchemylogopng_120x150

Alchemy is really a very simple premise of a game.  You start with 4 elements, and by combining them you create other elements (for example earth plus water equals mud), then from there you create other items by combining what you have.  When I started out there was 270 items, but recently the author, through update has increased this total to 300.

Again, simple easy to understand and control wins the day.  There is no lengthy manual for Alchemy… none is needed.  Simply a couple of prompts that inform you of what to do on each screen and you are good to go.  The things I like about games like Alchemy is that you can play them for as little or as much time as you have at any given time without losing your place.  That being said, I have spent quite a bit of time mixing and finding combinations and have lost several hours to its addictive powers.

There are two things that make the game a bit frustrating… the negatives if you will.  The first is that some of the combinations are just plain hard to figure out, and (as far as I can tell) there is no way, that based on logic alone that you will be able to figure all of them out.  It has taken me at times, just addding a bunch of random items onto the screen to see what else I may come up with accidentally.  The second is some of the items that are meant, I guess, as sort of tongue in cheek.  For example (minor spoiler alert) combining cancer and Bicycle give you Lance Armstrong.  I understand what they were going for… but it seemed a bit tacky to me.

But overall it is an enjoyable game that has a most excellent price of free.  (It is ad supported).  The author of the game on the website also offers “hint packs” as a source of revenue… this also borders a bit on the tacky side, but if you search the web, you will more than likely be able to find some clues without having to resort to paying for the clue packs.  I don’t begrudge anybody for trying to earn money on the products they create, but I would rather he have a “pro” version that you could purchase, or just go ahead and have a donate link.  Personally, I would be happy to pony up some cash for all the entertainment the game has provided.  And right there, is about as good an endorsement as I think I can give.  Here is a game that I would be willing to pay for, but (at least right now) you have have for the grand sum of nothing.

If you enjoy simple but addictive puzzle games, download it and give it a try.  And don’t forget to come back and tell me what you thought of the game.

You can scan the following logo with your android phone and it will bring you directly to the game in the Android marketplace.

First Look: Angry Birds for Android (BETA)

angrybirds_big


Angry Birds is nothing new for iPhone users, and I was more than a little curious why this game was so talked about and so highly anticipated coming to the Android platform.  I have been told it is available for the WebOS platform, but did not see it on the market, and to be honest, while I like the WebOS platform, what few games I have tried playing on my Pre has left me running for the much bigger screens of my Android devices.  But this is not about the Pre, it is about Angry Birds.

Now given the hype surrounding this game, I tried to prepare myself for a let down.  After all, it is still just a BETA, and how could a game made for a phone be “all that?”  For the few people that have not heard of Angry Birds before, the premise is quite simple.  The back story is that a group of pigs stole bird eggs and the Angry Birds are trying to get them back.  What the game does is bring you through a series of “fortresses” that the pigs hide in and you must launch from a pre-set slingshot the Angry Birds at the fortresses in an effort to take out the pigs.  In a sort of sub game to the game, you get points for how much of the structure you take out, so while taking out the pigs on some of the earlier levels is relatively easy, you still wind up trying multiple times to maximize your score and garner a 3 star rating on each level.

I loaded the game on my Droid X, and the game graphics were incredibly sharp, and the game runs suprisingly smoothly considering it is a BETA (your milage may vary in this regard as I have seen a number of reviews complaining about issues with the game starting up… most notably on the HTC Evo 4G.

So, by now I am sure you are wondering, but how is the game itself.  Well, to put it simply, I now understand why this game is so liked and was so highly desired.  It is very addictive!  How addictive?  I had planned on writing this Saturday, but found myself engrossed in the 15 levels provided in the BETA (Lite) edition.  The game is extremely easy to control and understand, it is just hard enough to keep it from being too easy, and hard enough to frustrate you into trying again and again.  When you boil it down, it is really nothing more than a game of physics and geometry, lauching at this specific angle creates chain reactions and causes the structures to fall.  I have seen in a few reviews claiming that the version for the iOS is a bit smoother, and if true, it must be an amazing feat, because this game plays incredibly smooth with no perceptible lag or jagged graphics on the Droid X.

While the Beta is currently free, if it keeps the same price as the iPhone version, you can expect it to cost around $4 once the game is officially released.  The download weighs in at around 11.5 MB, so devices with limited space may find it a bit much (though if you have Froyo, you can load it on your SD Card), but other than that, I highly recommend downloading and trying out the Angry Birds BETA while it is available.   Just be aware… you may find time slipping away as this game engulfs you when you first start playing.